Thursday, May 23, 2013

The Politics of Disaster

Many politicians, especially Conservative Republicans, want to shrink the scope of the Federal Government; focused on the rights of States, they want policies and funding to be determined at the local level, free of Federal input or regulation.  Of course, should a natural disaster, such as a tornado or drought, affect their constituency, Federal assistance is sought and welcomed.

Unfortunately, while they recognize the hardships imposed by natural disasters, they seem oblivious to the trials and tribulations associated with poverty, unemployment and lack of access to medical care.  Often representing rural communities, which benefit from urban economies yet are sheltered from the difficulties that cities face, they minimize (if not completely ignore) the complex nature of human society.  To deny the Federal Government's essential role in the areas of social welfare, healthcare, education and environmental protection demonstrates a provincialism that, in turn, spawns an indifference to the challenges that confront many Americans.

The loss of one's home to a powerful storm is surely a terrifying and stressful experience.  Yet, it is no more devastating than the inability to house, feed and clothe one's children due to the ravages of poverty.  The victims of disaster, whether natural or man-made, need compassion and assistance, not political rhetoric and posturing.  Federal funding must extend beyond our bloated Defense Budget and the Farm Bill.